Jul 28, 2025
3 min read
> I was a software engineer because I was able to sit in this process.
It's funny because I don't like the software process at all!I like to think about technical problems - how something should work, given the set of restrictions - and I like to develop user interfaces (not necessarily graphic).
And I just like to use Claude code!I can say what to do and make a annoying part.
It's still a job in a way!Even the full "detail" wib, when I stick to the technical guidance to open the AI, I need to directly consider what I want.
I have shown the samples among AI / proxy code / dishes:
1) People who have not programmed for some reason for a while (like being performing and taking a break from the industry)
2) People who have begun to program in the last 15 years or more, and also match the time when programming has become a coveted career for money / lifestyle / luxury (selected for not knowing what they want, more than you know)
3) People who have never cared about programming, more to make products
In order to clarify the difference, there are group groups that probably will not prefer AI Dev:
1) People scheduled ~ 25 years (to date)
2) who like a programming process (when they start)
I am not sure if I am right in this observation and I don't hate any of the first groups.
I add another category: people who are encrypted in many languages but never specialized.And I deceived some more in written projects.
As A Lot of People here, My Earliest Memories of Coding Are From Me And My Siblings Typing Games Printed in A Basic Book, and Then Playing Until We Have to Go to Bed, Or the Power Went Out :) We Only Have and Lot of People Loading Thing in the Z80 minutesHave to Go to Bed, Or The Power Went Out :) We Only HAVE and Lot, Or The Power Went Out :) We Only HAVE and Lot, Or the Power Went Out :) WE ONLY HAVE AND LOT, OR The Power went out :):) We have only a lot of people loading in 80 minutes.
I saw a lot in this field, but I'm honest with that either.
I want to solve the problem, I know how to solve the problem, but I don't want to spend 30 minutes inventing how to make things with frameworks in X.
I know _ I have to do it but I can remember _ways _ways _ways, especially ai.Whists and can you check the project by checking the project or can do as the problem.
I see yourself in this description, and I like a new way to work on it new way.It ends the most yawging upward to come on my way, and that's what I hate most.I can develop a mental model in things quickly and the bike is not good, but it is better to focus on the building.
The model itself seems to be moving to the supplements of the companies behind it. It seems like a weekly event. We will receive new models from top dogs.
I've heard it a lot, but I don't agree a bit.It is not a plateau of IMO, they are improved in new things and it enables new opportunities.This is not often shown in traditional reference points (which become less and less useful potential indicators).
For example, in the twins 2.5.This is a great helpful field.Now before it was a crafty but useful as a stone reduced 30-40k symptoms.Now they work well with 100 + kt symptom and useful work.
The agencies also improve.
There is also evidence and independent of the movie and the film (i.e. They have been generally).They still have a mini-swine line.
I don't see the highlands of the model.I think our expectations have been ignored.
Model is able to do, but not like humans, the trial test of the Brute of the output.They can repeat until they succeed.
It is somewhat possible to do it, you have an exponential increase in costs for linear improvements - a case scale, when it makes 1 error up to 2, twice the original cost, 3 mistakes again, 4 mistakes again twice, etc.
The smart cache solves many problems there.If a fork fails in a way, the next time the cache search is a little pain / expensive.
This, of course, depends on how cache applies / where / when / how, but not insoluble for common questions / answers.
What is Heer's questions to be wrong: we probably probably care about the identification of sample feedback, even.
Except that the LLM are not people.Why do we continue to say "well? Yes, but man".
A wide range of skills and performance comes with people;LLMs are within this range.
The fact that no one is not the best of a man, the nest of a hunter is (usually) the player can defeat the ones you use.
As people last longer than Claude, and most of them want to be paid over $ 200 a month.I just don't get another person on my beck and call all the time.
This is not necessarily because the Llms Way is cheap, if they never go out of new degrees on their own prests at $ 40.
The software worth less than 10 k is worth creating and protect them because it is very insignificant.
I have coded for 35 years and I grew up to hate them.Most things I do, they must focus, and the focusing point, my life (young children) and something I don't do not to my career
I consider a useful tool for using the new library
I guess the business of the company's work is tiring.
We need a new version of the version and add this contract, add some details for this brand, make API calls, write certain models.
Identify the ID to be able to architte and I love to work.
I considered agent Github Copilot quite good for this type of coding.You write the architecture you want and I put it into the problem and it fills the rest.
Coding and fun things need to concentrate on services (which includes a lot of system architecture, people management and I do well).
In the beginning you go to your life's point and occupation where you are going to make a better engineer or a better environment to build engineering.# 1 # 1 truly hard to be difficult # 1.
I do not want to write a code exactly the code I can write at a professional level do not overlap the new fangs, which is in the case of the new FIB Framework, so I do not know what I do and do not copy from the example.
This may make it difficult that the vast majority of people who call themselves engineers do not do so at the level I consider to be a professional;Especially in the world of programs / websites in the world.
The way I read it (and I agree, so biased) is that the OP hates that the focus of the writing code is usually considered negative, so it is difficult to focus on the broadcasting and life content of the code assistants.
That's all, this is the stage of life that makes the focus impossible, and coding is a big medicine when you are in the zone.And I was very good a few years ago when I worked in the zone of many simultaneous systems (and distributed).
There are many people on this site who should be able to treat it (and who is much better than I - I was a championship player who played in the club's second league, and here is an active galaxy).
It's a long time and now I change a AdL (a football player on his own workouts as it is the best thing for the best.
Sometimes I wonder if there is an high -class sports stars as per when they move from school, I took a few years to understand and get.
Many tradeless company programs add / remove only functions, add the Ausox box, it is never new.
I have never seen a lot of people that properly programmed as far as possible and grow to hate.Opposite someone usually trying to be what else (CTO, executive, and in order) but because of financial difficulties, struggling for connections and promotions.Do you believe this is not more than your case?
Mardi's number was a 5 -year -old child and I love a writer by my teams and I am good by my teams, and I have my teams and my teams, for example, and I love writing code by my teams and are very good at teaching them.
I spent the pandlimica as one of the main work of the adult of the adult, but helping groups and others to do the same time.
Now, finally, finally, I'm trying to integrate the engineering group.
With this context, yes, I would go to full -time coding kicks and the transition, and which means that my impact is more limited.It is worth it that I am doing, but both pay well :-).
Sounds interesting, and at first thought you might have been powerful, but mostly when I read the people mentioned "to correct the populated puzzle", then I saw a big difference in fun.To me would not correct the puzzle, but rather than getting the best sign or a majority of something hard
If health issues may be developed such as carpal tunnes, or sciatica, therefore affected a carpal board or sciatica.
Only 20 years after preferring.I have the program that I like to do for fun or model and I don't have to be
If the action wants to use me for work, why are most progressive development on the weekend and get the energy to make my diet.
In contrast, I find that LLMS has been running mentally.
I can't enter the state of the flow, due to work streaming, and then waiting for the other feature, I remained in a cycle where I try to set important decisions or movements.
It is possible to have a payable application for an agent and LLM, but the experience of viewing and directing it is a wonderful thing that makes chaos.
Instead, I like chat interfaces when LLM is integrated into the workflow.
I went to computer because I liked the mysterious aspect.In high school, I participated in computer lessons and all we have done was to resolve questions about the program competition and I loved it.
Software technology is very different.There is a lot of smooth and annoying work I don't like, who does not like AI on CSS, I want to spend 4 hours to focus and round the corners.
I don't use the design of AI AI A to One Shot, even if I can use it to brainstorm and think through ideas.
If we adhere to the definitions of the accepted, yes.
Whether the computer software is in order to build a computer, whether or not to give the true ways you follow him.
Coding is using some kind of language mentioned above.You will take some things and turn it into a test representation.
Computer Science is mainly to study what a computer can do and what cannot.It is a real foundation of everything
The software engineer is about making software by following the engineer principles.Most of them are a small part of them.
Many people are about the engineers about the computer program.
For me, this is like saying about a kind of music "The guitar was always a tool to finish. You use a tool to do something. I love doing things."
Truth, but it is different to write music on Nater vs to encourage the song in Suno. Gitar / a piano / Ableton / also a gift, what is Suno ... I don't know well.
But this difference is that I don't want to use the day to have music.And the same - although I also consider the "one-last method" - I also want to use the Claude number to make an app.
I am probably here in a minority, but I also produce house music as a hobby and I like the idea of loveing this idea as a production tool.
I paid $ 10 to try the last Sunday 4.5 model and one of the songs, it was amazing (for me) and blowing as much as the music of my Pandora station, which I would never know.
I am very happy about the future of "Eternal Foreign Jikebox" where you can hear chronic music it is like your taste and never feel the same song twice.
I work hard to judge but "Infinite Personal Juke Box" makes me a nightmy.ik means to me for me.
You don't describe a world where music in any social context.This songs of friends, none of the world "inspiration" is not rewrite.
Our best connective advice in this world is deprived of their social and emotional importance. This is the lift music of our personal elevator.
It is a change that has changed you, but it may not be the ones that may not be.
Most people don't even meet the pasture, even if we make it.I think you have any point but those who do not watch questions or answers are not important for the situation and background.
So even if they agree with you and create content anyway, because they like it or are profitable, where are you going, in your argument or outside the hypothetical situation?I don't understand how you can put the genes back into the bottle.
I do not know if there is a mutual relationship between groups as you say, but I will add some contradictory stories.
I began to learn to plan at the same age that I learned to read, so since the late 1980s.While I finished secondary education, I understood from the first principles (then I wrote) a 3D raw engine in Acorn Basic and then OS.At the university, I learned Java, and when I graduated later, I learned myself objc and Swift.One of my job, I got a little C ++ while he was there.Another, Bethon.I have a lot of side works to see it.
Even if I know the bugs and errors of the LLM form code, I always find the code of better actions much better [0] than a significant fraction of the people with whom I worked.Do not miss having a colleague who is boring self -propelled or thought of the "good" appearance [1].
[0] Defective models are barely automatic filling - automatic filler, but the worst models I tried, not even.
[I] Appreciate Quad Nemo in the At extra -Potest Disease, SI Confederator Ansidant Cum Eliquis descriptions of EODEM Predicementum Ut Im '.
Only I am not a programmer, I worked for coding a web design agency as part of my job, and now you are a primary school teacher.I don't like the program code because I didn't write the program code!
But I do not use this summer, not standing on personal projects, and I only like this experience!
Just as I say I don't like the table, but hey this beauty Ikea (or 3D -print) save they are not for the benefits, and you still need to build houses.
I like the experience that people share to meet this, so I know that there are many important factors that have affected those who have viewed my programming program for many years, combining the happiness of writing clearly/reliable with the happiness of the high language (Ruby).To display code in pomegranate and frames, you almost never write a boiler, so everything is interesting and the best way to understand the code is printed (that's why most books require you to print the sample code yourself).I think I will share my experience.
I fall into a 25-year-old version of experience. Maybe more, this agent, this agent did not come to the executive details of this solution.
I like to use Claude code with two events.land where I don't care what it looks like.One shooting object cannot be saved.
Or replacing my true hands in coding.
We are long -lasting, but weird when I got older, it's the opposite to me: I found more special about clarity, readability, especially in the leadership of the end.
I'm a little difference in your list, imo.men ~ 25 years.
I'm using the Kload code for two reasons:
1. Because I love him or not, I think it's a very important tool for our technology and get me.
2. Because my motivation exceeds my physical ability, especially in age.
Claude Code is definitely not for my wishes, but I still work to find values in it - thinking about workflows that accelerate the general time dev, etc.It is not yet necessary, but my fear is quickly enough for it to be required for everyone except entertainment interests.
The first time I paid for the code 25 years ago.I program from a young age and always.I like to create computers.
I do not love the process in the machine, you can use databases in the machines, you can do a little in the machines, you can be the most powerful ones in the machines, you can be the most powerful patients you could do very well to help you in CI.
It's what's obvious to me that the significant part of work is typical.Some 80% of my code are made by an agency.They are very sad, such as CI2E test tests!Sometimes they work miracles, sometimes they changed to cheats cheat, but you are looking for a tone, but you're looking for you.Could not
But are representatives help me to make computers doing things, more.I will use them.
I am in a group of ~ 25 years and my only AI is Anand F ** ing Bokerplates, who still insist on emphasizing the developer who is almost the same, but not enough.
Actually, I can do the job I like and that is the problem that solves the problem.
> Explaining the difference, here are some examples that are not like God ::
> 1) People who have programmed for ~ 25 years (so far)
> 2) those who really love the programming process (when they start)
> I'm not sure if I'm right in this observation, and I have no impulse in the first group.
I've been programmed for almost 30 years.He started when I was 9, and I looked at the code every day.
I love AI encoding and leading teams.Because I like to solve big problems.
I can say that some right, but your own bias can go a little here :-)
I think it will come to one of your last points.This is not necessarily a difference in a specific difference in those who like to use "AI" or not - in my experience there is only another type of technology employees between new and old.
At one end you have the old gray that maintains miniprey systems with unclear cobol niches that LLMS will never have insight.On the other hand you have people working in the last brilliant thing.
I don't think the money or love is for real work: I know that many people who need to help, all these two groups Technology: Alas and LlM's have just cleared.
I am equal to me and 2) and Ai Dev ...
Under thirty years of the belt in the industry, the best turns that everyone has - laziness ... If I had to do something 3 times, I can automatically explain the shit ... Ai Dev has moved the automation of the worldly parts of our business to a different level and I don't think I can coded without it
There are many groups on the Internet about vibe.ba.
Most people who know AI code devices use AI code tools and do not respect or try different events.
Whenever I see that someone claimed that the other side is dead or useless (manual programming or coding of AI), it seems that they listen to foreign sides in a personal preference or an ideological war.
To be fair, I started programming in the 90s, I really enjoy the process, but I really enjoy the intermediary coding.Thinking at a higher level means you no longer have to do all the work.I have proper software engineering, but I don't need to write anymore.The speed is 2nd floor compared to manual writing.
I "includes people who use Verbos program / environment to use the Verbos program / environment": but perhaps it is the feasibility monument in all groups.• Another statement is the language, you will be more attracted to ai.
I really make programming but I don't like maintenance programs don't like to love with others.
This leads to what no one wants to do and burn.
The seeing non-mood analysis does not return to analysis for additional hours and hours later.
Unfortunately, we disagree with the simple code Methods.
And we did not realize the result of the time of LLM change and is sure it does not present mistakes or removes load insects.
Static analysis and test apartments are not good enough to run very big changes in production.
We have the number of lines of cyclication, the number of cyclication, and in one way and traveling in one way.
And we do not have a means to make sure we will make allowances to commit obligation / Junior / internal / internal / internal / internalized.
Reduce Cyclomatic complexity says a little bit about what we worry about when we talk about the simple code.
Systomatic complexity says almost almost almost an architectural complexity.It is a reason why talking about the Kikoati complexity that felt out of favor of 20-30 years ago.First he tried to use it as a software quality metric and failed.
We do not agree with the metrics of software quality.
Optimizer who tried to reduce his function code lines and reduce the system in specific types of care.
Both of these measurements probably expect you when you really expect what you need when you want to simplify the code.
Never in a million years will I allow someone to leave and spend hours and hours unattended to change tens of thousands of code lines without target, but to simplify the code.
Like any attempt to classify humans, he falls into shorts with many exceptions.
I was what I do over 32 years old I love programming and did not stop after starting.
I like CLAD code?Need to learn a little over the last year.There are not too low to study and API for formatted formatting and APIs are spending time for the lead.This year moved to Ghogisvaze and baby with baby's water.
I can't understand what group was that until the last moment, so I don't think you are right.In my personal network, the highest people with a lot of programming experience have the most positive attitude and seem to be more pragmatic in this regard.
This is also my experience, sometimes when I use code tools, I really feel like a 10x engineer.Enough experience to know what I want and, if necessary, correct the course, and I can immerse myself in the code and help if necessary.
This seems to be an amazing group of super -talented junior / middle engineers, as well as with some smart machines in the crown.
A few questions: old people in your personal network are-practical _Lely_?And are they ~> 25y experience?If no, I took them into consideration.
I went to this business to side science, I love you to solve problems.I am very well to have a problem.
Most people have been voluntarily killed and pleased against this craft against the help of the AI who express themselves with their actions.
I'm just in the last group, and I don't like / don't like the term: I think the Code's Code / Code Displaitor Latement.
It is capable of having new tools, it is most likely to see the entrance plate on the outskirts of the tasks: drive a F1 car, but the F1 car may soon be damaged by a sound case.
If a person/dislikes, this is not a democratic power on the border.
I know I am like ai ai ai my duties don't want to do, and I'm upset with the task I like it.
An example of a non -programming example, I do some things in library music.
(I also don't push a man here; before using artificial intelligence for these tasks, I did it wrong, bad!)
It's not really much wisdom, who love programming don't want to outsourcise them at AI, with people who may build up all things.
This is possible, but this line of the division is only known that the AI AII was stolen through the area through the area around everything.
I think coding is appreciated, but I think situations are abolished from them.The word "close relationship" comes to my mind.If you lose a close relationship with the code writing (or never win), you will agree with AI.
Perhaps you sometimes think you are like a code, and you can lose it by mistake.
I love the app but I don't enjoy counting how to use the monkey of others.
Things I like most "good" points "I would like to use a library for (HTML Dom, Database) but I found something very attractive and independent.
When I use llms to produce the code you continue to interface for some library or I don't want to spend entry time.
I will be using myself as a proclaimer, but I know who is happy that he is a loved one.
Programming for 4 decades, the language of the language with my C ++ compiler is pleased and likes to solve the mystery.
And yet, I see AI as a wonderful gift.It restores original feeling and happiness.Also take care of a lot of fatigue (no, migration to a new library/API has never been fun)
And, the best of all, how is a good / precise thing to obtain the validity of the quality code is a puzzle.
But I don't think your attribute is right -is wrong, because 'Ugh !!Ai! "His Majesty was really a bigger, specialty and" expert "people- I was more inclusive
Nothing is wrong, it's not a program, but it is still "hackers" and accept the back to select the election.
I don't think of a second) is unique.Most people in this section know that after meeting hypen will be rewarded, but I am not sure everyone like vibeec.
If you have the process and pattern you follow, I would imagine how to get AI DEV to realize.
It's easy to protect your categorization by everyone who claims to be reluctant.With a mind.I put on an English rigid upper lip and learn the next thing, but I want to be honest, I'm not 20 anymore. I changed, things changed.Get a really intelligent code, the golff function in C ++, and abuse your imagination during the day until I had to go back and know the WTF I wrote and write and write an al -time.
So even before artificial intelligence, the enjoyment of programming has developed and changed my taste. I must waste less time in writing and write almost boiling disgust that I must see.I often write things in new/different languages I will be transparent, I am not aware.Separately, I just raise my eyes, catch the sleeves, and work,
Instead of getting out to disgrace on how the future of lineup is stupid, and even save my own newspaper from the guide on the sort of LLMS.Because they produce a lot of stupid codes, but during my career, I will lie if I never had it.
It is a big question, I love Aid?Because this will leave me out of work "thousands of thousands", it will be easy to hate.But, just as the earth and my work went to the fat customers in Windows in 90s, the work will appear to match, and alleviate it.
In the first list, you do not usually get the deep understanding to meet things and give excuses that they may be addicted to the other coming to be more addicted.
I don't like how to sell this skill in the face of people _do_ want to make SWAN and enter this way of work _ Because they prefer to make it.The fact that they ignore the truth and increasing the concern to bring the greatest support, almost all of these tools are driven.
We criticize the combined criteria to collect terms and produce or produce goods.
100% with you.I think I like to write code until a few months ago when I can say exactly how I want it, only the structure and purpose for today.I try to do things and writing code is the price that I have to pay in terms of my time.
Agree.The boundaries of software technology are mostly idomatic.I used my "scribe" mind to go through the library's dependence for many days to solve some artificial intelligence.
Automatically reblogged money code if not to the software engineer.Yoo is arbitrary and fake packages.
Using the "Secretary
For me, fun part of the codes to get inspired by products or systems I want to be and write only the number as the final path.
Claud code (Assistant / assistant agent) is the best of my programming work.From this point up to a point, the restriction from the reality of the reality of the code and units or loading parts of sub-system.
Now, I work with the cloud to immediately monitor my vision.It completely automated the comprehensive decision -making (I should name this variable, I should keep the function where, I can better reorganize this function, etc.).Moreover, it sometimes comes into thoughts that are in my head even better than that.An excellent knowledge of programming, it is always available, and it never believes.
With and I have everywhere about the social implications of such a system.But without a doubt, it provides an extreme value to the world of software and will only continue accelerating the query to new software.
The cost of software will also decrease, although net more options will be discovered.I am excited to see the software revolutionary fields represented, such as schools, shops, governments, finances, etc. We don't need another delivery application, despite how much they can be.
I saw the accelerated codegen that he likes to make all boring mutes that I hate:
Error == do while true.
Trying to correct the mistake
Look for Google for failure
Trying to correct the error
Claude does all this for me now, not the details, but allows me to focus on the final goal.It never changed my workflow;He's just making me all the terrible ordinary pieces.
I like and recommend their work not everything sun and pink until they are accepted until the product is sent and we can go to work in the next nightmare and go to work.
If you enjoy being a leader of the assault, no one will punish you, as you say, there are many nightmares of cleaning and each team needs people who want to clean.
This will keep you away from the bleeding edge function/product space because you lack a nice skill in actually developing the app.You skills now talk to an LLM and fasten a nightmare code and do not work with new things that need expertise.
I think the text code is never shortened.
Vibe Crocking can be fast but symbolic products, CI / CD, code review, Uut, reactionary tests, safety studies
And reality when you look at all these things that are not really needed if you do not listen to all public directions.Do you have to do the same exercise, or have always done.
To this end, if you have a very big thing, it is usually important unless they build code speed.
I also tell you the definition of OPS definition "hacking", not "Code.
They can escape from the loop by using the artwork development as the LardD or use an error rather than to be struck.
Usually when people knock on the Mahadar, they don't know what they do or how the software works.
This is like a problem with the authors' empty page.It's really difficult to do.
But if you have a text page, you can edit it to improve it.
With LLM Tools I can find a solution to find a solution of shit (shit).And I can do it and write it and write it.
But sometimes the shy solution is enough for my purpose.It works and does not break the cradle completely.My pants were fixed and there is no need to increase the stupidity of the Tui YT-DLP that created me.
For me, the problem with the vision is that the things I want to date are above AI capabilities (rather complex games) that I don't even want to try it out.And for things I take and use free because they don't really add to me.
I found the best in writing of Bash, automatically, FFMMAG command line line.
When I work in a big team, I realized that I even rely on many of others' work to understand the technology less and I have to catch up.
Even if you work on such a large complex system, I think coding agents are still useful at least take very specific instructions/instructions you write and write for you.Then, follow another tedious work, such as creating units on pure function, adding comments, creating documentation, etc., all increase the quality of the code base without demanding the work on your part.
Also, new or complex projects, you are likely to use the agent to use an agent to make a lot and architecture and boring.
Don't disturb your whole thing, but don't you find a condition that has an intelligent illustrations?
I agree that it is clear to clean it, which means people), usually criticizing, making mistakes, a life happened.
Last Friday, I converted a limited Python problem in other languages and faced difficulties in digesting an optimizer that is easy to write, but almost does not support other languages.One AI tool is detected and used repeatedly using a machine using a linear printer, which is ordinary from the very beginning, but the beginning of the spelling of AI.Another struggle is trying to make the right grammar in combination with overall efficiency, and I feel that I am investing a second questionnaire (read: $) in the software that is equivalent to a game machine that constantly apologizes.
The feedback cycle of "Maybe the next time" turned into a few hundred questions, resulting in finding the attempts of the LLM was a knot of the knot of things that tried and did not work, and now you are a few dollars and hours of engineering time.
With calculator items you can always write complete unit tests and complete to check the AIS function.
TDD (and public units tests) - I still say that you can't touch the test or use a hinge about cloude, you may not allow you to edit any of the test files.
Then indicate to the problem, you will decide if the tests pass.
I prefer to work with a person.Even with our imperfections, it's still good to be lying from a can.
I did not become a developer developer Sofloper Same Sameplate and Sameplate error and the same sameplate error and the same string design, same report creating, the same joint and shape, shape, shape, shape, shape,
Bloggers have been mocking themselves for several years about some enthusiastic, demanding this intellectually, some of the IQs, as if they play chess with death on the beach every time Max Von Sido writes.FTWARE software is so amazing.
In your brain you have a limited electric charge to do interesting work every day.If you spend it on a company, you will not be able to do it, the algorithmic work is very interesting.
I worked at Visual Studio 20 years ago, once he had a chance to go to a fair to represent the company.
As I handled the booth, this software developer came to me and said that VS had been too good on the code generation to automate data supply, and we had to cut it because it was a big part of what it did.I thought he was joking, but no, he was a bit serious.
I said something to him about how they saved him from getting tired of working so he could focus on higher prices, more interesting, but he didn't.
I think it often, especially those days.
I think I partially agree, your first paragraph is exactly how I feel.Caits and trivial things should be absolutely automated.It is also true that people promote a narrative in which programming is dark art and you should use x methodology or y. Bro, chill, web.
On the other hand, software development is a greater sentence, that is, it provides solutions to real people's real problems, is certainly intellectually in demand and enables a number of standard deviations at skill level.
> "Producing the solution to real problems, which is close to real people, undoubtedly looking intellectually and there is something that allows many standard deviations in skill levels"
Imagination, but my imagination is the coding tools (or library unsonhaling unsulating unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsulang unsorshaling unsulangsunsalms unshaling unsonShaling unsulang unsulang unshaling unshaling unshaling unshaling unshaling unsonShaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonhaling unsonshsils
That is exactly why we moved from an assembly code to higher -level languages and then use frames.
No one will pay you to make a CRUd web application for you, they will pay you to solve the problem.
Do not take any more points to use the Java application to use the plane without the plain.
LLMS Automation -> Intelligence -> next renovation of language servers.
Instead of automating a method or property, they can automate all unit tests and functions by analyzing codbase standards.
+1, and also add: this is not even a new phenomenon.My hot and coding AI is only the last trend that literally worked in the industry for decades.The technology itself can be new, but what it does is very -very old!
You have to write a real code to stand as an end in the back -end.
Ditto Frontend.The strange stinglus must be mandatory, but we have gradually moved over the last decade ... declarative, reactive patterns that allow some of the main funds to handle busy work.
We have also created ... advertising composition files to ensure continuous post every time.Do you know instead of ssh'ing in manufacturing machines to install things?
We also remembered zero pointers and cut our hair because a lost check caused your entire process.Now ... it is built in the tongue and it is physically impossible to draw a zero indicator.
We have been old for decades "hurt or encouraging, in the etc.
This is just the last of the long things that software engineers do.
I don't agreeYou do not think that microorganisms should read the manual. People are smart enough to do.But the disadvantage is about this or desire to deal with her.
Most of these tasks should vanish.The remainder of the cost should be achieved by domain experts in half the cost.
If you have done all this work, go with a new programming language, as if the system had a perfect type of type where you could have all the pieces of heart and consider them at the essential steps you want to take, everyone would be happy.There would be people who flow on every developer who has not used this language.
LLM continues to produce all damage, which at some point must be maintained and read and understood.Potentially at a higher level than any human being.
A large part of what the C Mockers are rented can be made with good Macrones Lisp with much less technical debt.
I understand what you are talking about, however, Rotte trates are automatically negligible than Mercers in the working program.
The program is something that doesn't do them all.With a strong machine that you have a project, and the program is good to move the code into the programs.
I agree with this time, until I do so, "we don't have any problems."To stimulate the FFS Node?
I and I write to high levels and abstracts.
I'm not OP, but what he said, I can tell you two things:
1
2. He does not use computers to solve their problems.I have been working with a computer several times a computer software engineer.
It is a standard answer at any time when someone claims to be produced, reinforcing AI or you are not experienced or bad in your work.
Anyone who takes the real scat on any fun board, it is in every AI debate.
It is no longer useful.I just worked for a while and I would take a little bit of one of them because they closed the door.
I agree;I think the idea of the idea of being here, no one has a hammer and all my surplus.It is a matter of spirit that does the way of exercising.
I always feel as if I was not investigators, just as the border brothers have defeated a plan to control the scandal to control beer and hockey.
If I did something 60 minutes ago, and now the cloud code does it within 5 minutes, I will not spend 55 minutes to review this code.
I will spend 5 to 5 minutes to check and improve the code using Claude code and then every time I go to another story / fortress.
It is worth adding that sometimes I will spend ~ appropriate time, doing something with the clutch code, but the result is better.
Check out the mobile app, if I have the current user's authorization from the user's license from the user's currently, they have the instructions that will text them to write.
Super annoying makes the clad code not only possible to complete all the UI for each case, but also take a while.
He probably lost some of the worst cases on his own.
All in all, maybe not much faster than me, but I'm pretty sure the results were much better.
I use an excerpt from the time to confirm the LLM production of the root code --- what I really do, I am not a Vibe codes --- as much as I want to write it.I don't understand that people always hope it will be a Mic drop -back.
If you have written you feel that you have done something clear from a back -expected psychological pattern?
I still try to know the answer to this question for myself.
Well, of course I do that.
Mental expenses are not linear programming through tasks;It takes a lot of extraction to start a one -minute release.
My job pays well and I create real things but most of the work is just a slope.So I might have to use AI to save the effort for myself.I can save myself more free time ..
I think we are similar to using and managing social media, we need to make it incredible for some items.More modern rubber equipment or ducks.
Originally, "the AI" does not condense as a proprory or "intelligent".
If there is something I learned about software, "intelligent" usually means "we threw many intelligent people on the problem, and we have turned the solution still complicated."
Mechanical learning is not software, but it must be accessed as such.This is a program that gets a certain input and makes it a departure.But I guess if the company really cares about physical or mental health, we didn't have cigarettes or slot.
Assistant and weak, necrotizing beautiful text around "Computer Cloud" was to replace "cloud" and "someone else's computer".
You can do the same thing when you think about Ai. "Ai" -> "AI" -> "Ai"
Is a cloudy snark that is replaced "the replacement of the string Firefox; it is really helpful? Tempomagal Sem?
If we give the names of AI, we give the names of AI,
The back of our back if we are courageous, but it will produce something?
We begin to see how the strong use of social media is how it looks like the place of life.Maybe it's just my algorithm, but I see a lot of content, but I actually turn out real.I understand the irony here btw.
We look forward to using that conversation that is not used 2 decades ago.
I can't give an AIA code writing, and I check some code.It also is also for mistakes and style but for the architecture and style.
I spent the tail writing or other small things similar to HTML / CS, if you are writing in a sufficient depth to prepare imo, CSS or any code, I can't imagine it.
It's a great learning tool, check your work twice, inventing syntax or console commands, writing Bash disposable scripts, etc.
Can we get random training of 300 words in the collected developers?As a professional in this field, I actually reports that less rarely compared to the main infrastructure or software engineering.
This hosting may not have a ton of meat, but it has an echo and seems to be cooked for discussion.It is a time because we all try to find ways and when to use these tools.
Your description does not increase too much.Where is the thing to accuse?
For example, this is a great and valuable reading about his and the developer's productivity: https:///article?ID = 44526912
The skin does not only encourage talk because they do not bring enough raw items for installation.Some ideas is still worth as they are real, but I don't see any new.
This is a good way to introduce this.I didn't understand how he was shattered.First I was feeling Cilide and I was a team, but there were so much from the iron I've got on the turn of February.Happiness, I know enough to know when to go, but I see how a friend faded to a persuasuring and persuasion.gambling
I plan before 1978 and it was very happy.
More satisfied for me to think about the excellent algagnus, or finally to remove each last points you can either train the subjects.
But said it, I'm up a little bit and enjoying all the tiffs.Since Pasting the Pastest experiences in 2022 I was not a very easy experience and editor.
I now have one hundred percent using a chlor code with a mix of other models in the mix.It's great.
Yesterday I have done with CC at a pluugin clog for the Bigvy wrote in c ++.It's your own new player!I have a whole bit.
Of course yes it could have all the most experiences and still see it, but I don't seek.
I am also pleased that I can finally go all these projects that I have had in the background all these years.
The product is very nice, and the most important stuffs.poza to bring me and make me happy.
In irony, select this article to HN after Claudius Codler to read this article.
Using my Claude Code sounds with many ways in which people hear them use.I write the distributions of the middle detail task with strict requirements and then make Claude improve them.
It is a completely different experience from any other experience I had before.Despite the effort I have to make, it works to do.
Each ChatGPT or Claude code, too much time and is very inefficient, and reveals the average Dev Junior, insect, as far as behind him he will not redeem the project.
Software quality takes a nose.
Our industry is on the rock.
My unique knowledge of most people.
For example, the other day asks chatgpt to write an SQL DRUE file settings that formed the code as an example it provides.
He continued to invent all the rules of SQL FLUFF.A who were real laws were useless for the true form I wanted.
I agree, the rules of SQLFLINF are confusing, but that's why I ask for help.
I think the most common experience in trying to write these important things.He does everything that does everything.On the other hand, if you want to write a reaction application ...
But I don't know how to do, I'm not how to do this.Instead of trying to do this, because it doesn't work in my time to spend my time instead of me
We can reach some point.Don't recognize what you do and don't know.As I was terrible to make math, and it is much better with a little more effort.
However, it can be difficult to be corrected, so AI doesn't claim that he doesn't know anything because he doesn't like you.
It is not unusual for a student to say that they really do not know what they do when questioned.
Or you have different ways to use these accessories .Chatgpt is one way to clear things in .catgpt, the most effective way to use it.
Using an Agent Coding Assistant is your first step (there are many things like Cline, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and more).This is because you can go beyond the codebase, run tests, run consultations, search the web, or feed the exit yourself to validate fixes of what he has created/completed.
You don't have to adjust this stuff for an hour every time you set it up once, and then just give the team.
The skill limit is misleading, it feels very low at first (finally is just a natural language, isn't it?) But they get intuition where these tools work best, and where they split, as they, what to include, take a little first.
Because, if you are the biggest code, if you are the biggest code, if you do not give up the most comfortable or effective rocket.
Currently, I am too much of the proselytism, so many things weighs, but they have to see their own work.
Who says these devices don't make mistakes?Do not talk in my mouth or lies of the world, but there is a useful goods as it is.
The title is true -the title echoed when I spent years.
Oh great, together we are two points of data that strengthens the op -ov hair.
Right?I hope the weight system at some point will be clear enough to be biased with the wrong answers.Of course, the spread of the user entrance would be very useful, so I don't see that this is happening.
There are many ways to explain LLM and coding assistants.Slot machine is a beautiful good thing.
I compare you "s" to use the Ouija board.
I also compare the "artificial intelligence" with artificial virtual) the real series of diamis), even the real rate of the world."" AI "A" AI, "and I don't have everything you create. Idijaji time if I ask for" vanilla "will tell me" banana ".
I started using Claude Ai, Chat and Deepseek to help -to develop Windows applications with Delphi Pascal a few months ago.Ai has helped me.AI helped me to develop many special methods and functions that I could no longer think of me.I am vice -president in a company that sells computer network team.I still have to maintain my daily work.By the way, Claude Ai is the best so far when it comes to Pascal.Chatgpt failed, maybe it is better than other languages.Deepseek, it's average.
I fear that we have a generation of engineers who have not created the necessary skills of the thought / critical model that are necessary to assess the compromises and adjust the context to ask the right questions and interpret the answers.
We are certainly to share in a code generations and models, but are the engineers very much "what are you trying to do?"Or are they just going to combat and pull the slot of the slot again?
I agree with all when I use synchronous tools like windsurf and smart again.This is why I prefer the async workflow most.Using.I sometimes talks a little with chatgpt, because the loop begins to get fast.Submit it then and wait for • 5 minutes to complete.
Ui and other things are still using other materials and other items if it is difficult to determine the front and required.But I use 50 async: 1 synchronization.
Dear, I think, it works in a higher abstraction layer.It is not reliability, my call will generate something nice in this initial design, creating addictive game machines dynamics.But would these measures lose their magic if the results are completely determined?
Companies will stop paying rationally for slot machines that pay 90 0.90 US dollars for each $ 1 $ 90, but they will be happy to pay 5 US dollars to pay 5 US dollars each.
This would be an interesting issue.
At this point, I doubt that in many cases, I can call the company a reasonable actor.I will play both machines.And it is a little lucky to meet and have a reasonable leader.
> But these tools lose their magic if the results have been entirely determinists?
No. They would have been very useful and more magical, even with strange spells and Xaman rituals "more.
Out of any llm is not a choice, so its your favorite design is not working.
> Supercharge, which allows you to give life to full machines by stirring their own hands, which leads to emptying understanding for a longer period
I think you can use them as it, but if you try to understand in advance, you will do much better.So you can divide the problem into subtitles -based explanations that Claude will be able to solve without too much correction.
Also, you have to understand almost every task it has implemented.
This is a great tool when you use and properly, it is like an ideal in steroids, but it will not exceed the need to use the brain.
Love and I hate, the minimum you can give it: Claudius Code can mitigate the price of shaving Yak [1] .VOS needs this function of deviation / distraction, even if it is not the main administrator / infrastructure, etc."Whatever it is, let's just bored."
You will need to pay attention to the extra mechanics of CC, but can you take too much steps to improve the difficulties of success?For example, only in any type of level of loop will be allowed to code.Difficulties are solved.
In fact, the model I like to use is a packed machine where you can imagine all the available options, while the internal marker simply jumps randomly from pin to pin.
In other words: Choices find the single grandequal catching (and spreadable blen) as general-prociors for generations.
> Very painful strings to improve, allowing us to bring some, but if you want everything to work in details at the end.
The answer to this is a nuance.You can call code ~ 30K loc with CC without excessive adventure.Will it work?Perhaps in some ways you thought - it would be a startcrum of what's on your mind.
If you are not otherwise, you need to know the language of the language for CC (and _ _ do you know this language?
Varies to write about it about it, you can ask for a CC here that's here's here, do the pipes explain to me ... explain the pipes ...
Not black and white as I have this paragraph."Details" you need to switch through the spectrum to use the CC (or agent system) to use themselves in spocket areas.
(First of all, these last skill settings with the last skill settings with being a good programmer).
If you have a "one song", do not use CC, and do not put it in a box as if it were a selected programming device.
I have read this article before you understand that you don't mention in compiler 'CC'.Indeed, with this interpretation, especially the "if you know this language," it works with this interpretation.
I compare a quarter coding to win in one of my blog posts and thought the metaphor has not changed easily.
Claude works best for context -based model compatibility.I can use data on repetitive logical tasks with minor contextual changes.I can't imagine all the features of the given.
As well as a library as well as a library as well as library and savings framework for your own use.
With vibe coding, I suspect this is a group that actually adapted to it (with Hobby-Coders and No Code).Linear) in reaction when i just learned.In LLMS, and other frameworks.The resalation is not less that the code is low, but to work faster.The class that is randomly, speedy.
The unexpected device will be this item if the project is not too much in the library team / equipment that require "roadway that requires" in addition to its presence.
I plan in a way programming always is synthesis.(For my brain) Assembly of the object of many places is good, but not the main synthetic, which you can be made of yourself.Many people developed think there is no difference between both.There is no message about what life needs.
I just fought with a 4-day clod 4 Sonnet because I made a lot of rubbish for my use and I think about stop this system system, which is compatible with the system rules.What you have asked do not want to do as I say, but instead of something (rust) but not incomplete things or incomplete items.The context of the asyn or it loves clone or something else.Is OEMR indeed a big jump?
The declaration level after your brain in my brain to use these tools.
* To attend me "to Christian twins" what I am adding.
My time coding with Claudius was the happiest experience in 25 years of coding.
Give me most of the projects that remain interested in building and holding on their work.
I have a moment I like my life is beneficial and be enlightened.The best I can solve the problem and learn new ways.
Study paper, discuss with works, turn around, take notes, and let Opus check my notes.This also improved my study course.
I respect the different experiences we start from.For my honesty I share
It's ok that you have all this wonderful impression with llams.But this time in your life, do you show the code code?Because you don't show the other fan that you don't show anything, and that's annoying.
Surely.I will see something.I work on an application that will help learn French.I work in a busy starting yet to just lose loose, but then I do to create an application, mainly that in the help.When it is interest.It's on HTTPS: //yap.own.
[^1]: To make it clear, nothing on the front is protected by copyright.I use some copyright protected by copyright to find out how common the different words I need are, because I wanted the app to teach the most common words first.
Edit
In the rest of the programming world, many other aspects are probably touching good conditions.
Allow ENTERPRISE software to avoid heated discussion to the default, python or back written enterprise.
1. Professional programmers are not paid for writing blog publications and usually want to spend their free time doing other things.Hobbies have time, but they usually do not see the value of a boring language like Java, as they do not work on the team.
2. When something was known, it is boring to the readers about it, and therefore it was not so written about it.When something new, many people write about it, but it's hard to say who is right and who is wrong.
The good writing and additional marketing of each audience finds extra marketing comments on the Internet, not weird.It is better to talk to people you know people and trust people or a little try.
The same goes for performing now with reports on AI assisted coding.
Edit: they may also have said "visibility bias" and "innovation bias" if I had consulted a LLM before commenting.
Just like the one who uses Java over 25 years for the software but likes to program Python projects, let me give you another reason:
3rd Python has a very quick feedback -loop.
Not only is it compiled to Java, but he wants to be even bigger and wants to pierce growth.I have no time or patience for that.
I am in a very narrow Cadance and I have many choices that make most of my "pet" rocket, elixir, picolis and P5j, but sometimes I sometimes create a Maven project and start a hacking unit test because libraries and productivity are excellent and sometimes it takes less to get harvest.
Pharo is an alternative but documentation, and libraries are just not so good, and maybe it will never be.
Is this new "Source"?Comment (what, still ridiculous, still works).
But I don't think about how much the code is about wanted and teaching.
I had similar experience with OP.bo all these applications (most math) but also a tire) also used using a mixture of a mixture of clan and twins CLI:
I can probably build them all by hand, but with a 6yo I had never had time.He loves the games, his mental arithmetic has come up with incredible now, he does it "for fun".
Much of it is constructed by confusion that is much easier to relate to the hardest number of access to
In this example, I still try to buy a buyer yesterday and today, and I still try it: https://gitHub.com/rdate/tature/tature
I have now seen this, eliminating excessive ideas and a floral language, adding more tests and putting it quickly.
In both of these examples, I leaned over Claude to set the boiler room, Gui, etc., which gave me more mental budget game with complex aspects of the problem.PVZ.
Sometimes I consider it a slot machine and take a photo for happiness.But in the end it is more problems than worth it.
The most fertile way is to maintain a strong understanding of what is happening and all it is.Ask to confirm that it does what you say when writing tests and using resolution information.
Another thing that worked very well the other day was to rewrite some old JavaScript libraries that I wrote about Rust a few years ago. These things are not slot machine problems. Claude code nails consistently.
I took a wooden barrel with a licensed MIT prefix and I had Claude+Twins written to support untreated screens.In one day, I scanned wooden libraries, as well as different collections that did not change and found that nothing exists.
I used Vibe Kanban as a slot machine, and in the end there was a gross MCP server, which actually does nothing useful, what I can say.The main way, because I did not have a clear vision when I went in.
I always offered a lot of pets and attracted attention to their work and now focused on their work.
> I just often sit to read AI processing a problem and learns new techniques and tools.
I have a lot of similar experience, but often I wonder if I just go back to the extent of open source in the same subject and instead of that let me re produce him again.
Yes, the reason for playing games like some people.
I saw a small organic definition from high profile programs, and after seeing them, you don't have to work at least the commercial "AI" application.
The Simon Visice Group [1] Dengo Framework Terracy [2] is a great IA programming defender in his blog.
You can argue him to make money with the goals with their newsletter, and he really appeared to have something, but it is less than the CEO, who completed this information.
I am the only one who can't get a CC made me speed?I mean, it can, I mean to be one word .Bater I can see the best programs.
The most amazing is all that is conducted in a year or more.I guess it is very checked by the same old and a river because the project was not passed.
Date, day, I did not introduce a software flurry to enter a worker, day, day, day, and I want to be proud of engineers and decades.
The tool should create more interactive structures through an extremely powerful but strong, but not to accept this difference, "only" not accept this difference or not ".
If you improve it correctly and tightly, and check everything that makes big or small, it is a tool 10 times to grind very difficult problems very fast.
But can easily cause to get overconfigue and influence.what "cheat" without you understand.
It is good to use as a tool for more expansion without automating the clod code.And the best toolmakers and investors are the best to claim that it is aware of this and replaced by such things.
Right directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly directly ordinary direct man directly or nunited directly regain.
> I can be for hours, I will discover how something is used for something to get the idea that is done in something real.
So the developers are paid in a bad way and are considered unnecessary cogs.Who is the feeling "simple" and thus think that she is forced to feel free and firms on that feeling.
The truth is that growth is difficult and requires numerous mental functions, which are constantly rising, which you can change after 5pm and think about something else.Your brain is constantly at work.
This work also creates millions and billions that have been allocated by software developers and flow with greedy hands, which now control all production methods (think about cloud services, principles - try to start your own meeting today, all with the contents of the user, etc.).
Someone is £ 1 in London £ 100,000 £ 100k 100k
The developer moved to Chincar and to the rear of modern economics. The ideal was and that the Ideal became worthless, but the agreement was just like it.
You continue to succeed not to lag behind.Take the night "to get started".Gaslit is thinking about thinking about stocks in a private company are capital.You are fired via E -star - while the founders publish the Jahte selfie.
With a bad side?Most of you believe you are lucky.The engine is given to think about other employees of the 19th century.
The developers are paid poorly - not because of low wages, but because they are stolen upside down.
In the meaning, I can change the form of a complex static object or to do it, and it can do.What do you really say?
One reason why many things look like gambling is a lot of things like gambling.Navigate, gathering and other major survival activity before civilization like gambling.Prints look like gambling.Presentation even when it looks like a gamble, as a genetic refuned product, as a roller.
So we found a gamble gamble.
Whose types of other types of bites are cool?
Still, you really have to take oh, none of these is automatic.I don't feel like I've done something like that, I don't know if it's good or bad.You don't miss the shit of water work.I'm gona.
This is a general argument for the AI generation and I don't like it because people get their excitement from various things.Some engineers get their pleasure from the creation process, others get their pleasure from the final results.
The device is the only tool.HAD and strong, but a single-time device.
You can't use anything, you can dream the hoodpody clancodcurtcuts.
The bonuses that are sold naturally in brains are found: a great source of achievement strategy is a great source of achievement strategies.
Very fun, because I don't like the software technology process at all!I like to think about technical problems - how something should work with a series of limitations - and I like to design user interfaces (don't have to be graphics).
And I just like to use Claude Code!I can say what to do and this is the annoying part.
He is still working!I need to think about what I want and I need to try it, and if I stuck it, and when it's gambling it, I have to get it a technical instruction.
